Switch language

Menu

Anti-racism is not a bargaining chip! 20 organisations call on Die Linke Berlin to honor its election promises

Justice Collective

Collage with politicians and other images

In an open letter, 20 civil society organisations have taken a stand ahead of the upcoming coalition negotiations. They call on Die Linke Berlin to consistently implement the commitments made in its election program to combat racial profiling, police violence and structural racism.

Berlin, 3 November 2026 – Anti-racist demands must not be sacrificed in exchange for participation in government. This is the message we, as civil society organisations, are sending to Die Linke Berlin. We call on the party to stand by its commitments to a progressive approach to public safety, as set out in its election program, and to implement them should they form a government.

For years, we have been fighting racism in state institutions, racist policing and the criminalization of migrantized communities in Berlin. We support people affected by police violence and discriminatory police controls. We see how structural racism embedded in current security policy makes everyday life unsafe for many people in Berlin.

“We expect a left-wing party to pursue left-wing politics. This includes tackling structural racism in state authorities and standing up for a vision of safety rooted in solidarity,” says Lara Möller of the Justice Collective. “Instead, the exploratory talks have shown that the party apparently seems willing to sacrifice a progressive approach to public safety at the negotiating table in exchange for participation in government. We will not let this go unchallenged.”

Any participation by a left-wing party in government must be judged by whether it brings about genuine structural change. We expect Die Linke Berlin to take its political commitments seriously and to consistently oppose racism, policing and surveillance in the coalition negotiations.

Signatory organisations:

Justice Collective e.V., Kampagne für Opfer rassistischer Polizeigewalt (KOP), Kiez ohne Kontrollzone, Ihr seid keine Sicherheit, Kein Generalverdacht, Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie e.V., Wrangelkiez United!, Bündnis Görli zaunfrei, Courtwatch Berlin, reach out / Ariba e.V., Flüchtlingsrat Berlin e.V., Beratungs- und Betreuungszentrum für junge Geflüchtete und Migrant:innen, With Wings and Roots e.V., Hydra e.V., Komitee zur Unterstützung der politischen Gefangenen im Iran-Berlin e.V., AK Antirassismus und Migration der OMAS GEGEN RECHTS Berlin, My Brain My Choice Initiative, BIWOC* Rising, Iranische Aktivist*innen im Exil - Berlin, BIPoC for Future

Cases from our archive

Case 39

A young woman experiencing homelessness is sentenced to 90 days of fine payment for supplying drugs. The conviction will not appear on her Certificate of Good Conduct (Führungszeugnis), which was important to her, but the court punishes her with a high fine even as it acknowledges she was supplying drugs because of her poverty.

The War on Drugs
Racist Policing
Criminalizing Poverty
Fine
Drug Offense

Case 24

The court hears a case in which a young man is accused of multiple charges, including drug, assault, and robbery charges, some of which involve a knife. After 6 hearings, mostly consisting of taking evidence from police witnesses, the young man is sentenced to prison and mandatory drug treatment for a total of almost 7 years. The court does not take into account victims’ actual needs: victims are instead asked leading questions to support a harsh punishment and are ridiculed by the court. The structural context of the defendant’s actions is largely absent from the proceedings.

Knife Panic
Racist Policing
The War on Drugs
Prison
Assault
Drug Offense
Other Offenses

Case 21

The court puts pressure on a man to revoke his appeal of a conviction for resisting arrest and assault of police. Despite the defendant’s distress, the judge appears uninterested in the man’s account of the alleged offense. The outcome–no relief for the defendant–appears predetermined by the judge, prosecutor, and the defendant’s attorney.

Racist Policing
Other Outcomes
Assault
Other Offenses

Case 16

A young man is sentenced to insult for statements during a police control. The court does not take into account the man’s apology or experience of the control as discriminatory. He is threatened with a harsher sentence and so accepts the high fine he had appealed.

Racist Policing
Fine
Other Offenses

Perspectives