Switch language

Menu

New finding published: courts reinforce societal injustice with their punitive approach to drugs

Justice Collective

Graphic illustrating the War on Drugs: Showing handcuffs, cannabis leaves, and nondescript substances

For now more than six decades, the global War on Drugs has failed to curb drug markets or to protect the health of communities.1 But it has been remarkably successful as a tool to expand and normalize the punitive power of the state.

From the start, the global drug control system was rooted in deeply racist assumptions about which substances should be banned, and which not. Since then, drug policies have continued to be designed and implemented along racial lines, at the international and local levels. As studies from various countries reveal, disparities exist at every stage of the criminal legal system – in stop-and-searches, arrests, sentencing, and incarceration rates.2

Germany has been no exception to the racist enforcement of drug laws. Here, too, people from racialized and migrantized communities are disproportionately policed and punished for drug-related offenses. In addition to factors like racist policing, courts play a central role in sustaining the punitive and racialized logic of the global War on Drugs. As our observations of more than 300 cases – many of them drug-related – in Berlin criminal courts show, courts treat drug-related offenses as matters of moral failure and criminality rather than public health or social inequality. In doing so, they reinforce patterns of racist policing and disproportionately harsh punishment against racialized and migrantized communities, while largely ignoring the structural conditions – such as poverty, exclusion from the formal economy, and unequal access to care – that shape people’s involvement with drugs.

Court observations reveal how judges draw on flawed and stigmatizing ideas about drug use to derive negative “social prognosis” assessments and justify harsh sentences, even in low-level cases. At the same time, recent legal reforms like the partial legalization of cannabis are applied unevenly, benefiting more privileged groups while leaving repressive practices intact for others. In this way, courts do not merely apply drug laws but actively reproduce a system that criminalizes, pathologizes, and marginalizes people – particularly those affected by racism and intersecting social forces – under the guise of legality and “help.”

Read our full analysis of how courts reinforce inequality by how they handle drug-related cases here and read our latest case reports in our archive.

Citations

  • 1

    Following Kojo Karam, we use the term ‘War on Drugs’ to refer to the internationally and domestically enforced prohibition of illegal intoxicants, The War on Drugs and the Global Colour Line (2019), 2.

  • 2

    For details on these studies, see our findings.

Cases from our archive

Case 39

A young woman experiencing homelessness is sentenced to 90 days of fine payment for supplying drugs. The conviction will not appear on her Certificate of Good Conduct (Führungszeugnis), which was important to her, but the court punishes her with a high fine even as it acknowledges she was supplying drugs because of her poverty.

The War on Drugs
Racist Policing
Criminalizing Poverty
Fine
Drug Offense

Case 38

This case concerned a person currently serving a prison sentence being found with a small quantity of cannabis, an amount that would usually not be prosecuted in Berlin. The person is brought to the court from the prison to stand trial and is sentenced to a €30 fine.

The War on Drugs
Fine
Drug Offense

Case 37

A white defendant with access to private counsel is sentenced to a fine for possession of 15 small bags of cannabis, with a total amount of cannabis above the legal threshold for a “low quantity” (nicht geringe Menge). The court accepts her account that the cannabis was for personal use, and justifies the relatively mild sentence with a favorable assessment of the defendant living a “normal bourgeois life”.

The War on Drugs
Fine
Drug Offense

Case 36

In a case heard shortly before the 2024 law change that legalized certain forms of cultivation, possession, and acquisition of cannabis in Germany, a young man is accused of selling cannabis via car delivery. Despite the relatively low quantity of cannabis found and the person having childcare responsibilities and financial difficulties, the prosecution recommends a sentence of over a year in prison. In the end, the judge imposes a long probation sentence, severe in light of the impending opening of the cannabis market.

The War on Drugs
Probation
Drug Offense