Switch language

Menu

“Efficiency” at the expense of justice – Criticism of proposed criminal procedure reform

Courtwatch Berlin

Collage with people in suits, Strafbefehle, a stopwatch, and scales of justice.

Berlin, November 16, 2026 – A coalition of civil society organizations has issued a statement criticizing a proposal for reforming Germany’s Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO), presented to the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection (BMJV) by a commission today. The plans to make criminal proceedings more “efficient” threaten to further undermine the rights of people affected by mass criminalization and exacerbate the criminalization of poverty.

Since May 2025, the Disrupt Mass Criminalization coalition has been observing court proceedings every week at Berlin’s fast-track court, or Schnellgericht. Almost all cases that are tried there involve low-level shoplifting or riding public transportation without a ticket – offenses closely linked to poverty. Those standing trial are generally people living under precarious conditions. A verdict is reached in just 15 minutes.

“We are already seeing what happens when criminal proceedings are designed for maximum speed: people who are already in difficult circumstances are sentenced to fines that threaten their livelihoods within a matter of minutes, without legal representation and without a thorough examination of the evidence,”, says Katharina Lambers of Courtwatch Berlin. To coincide with the publication of the final report of the Commission on the Code of Criminal Procedure today, the group is releasing a statement outlining how fast-track proceedings and penalty orders (Strafbefehle) exacerbate poverty.

“The speed of these proceedings comes at the expense of an effective defense,” says attorney Nevin Duran, who supports people at the fast-track court. “We repeatedly see defendants’ rights to a defense being effectively hollowed out in fast-track proceedings in order to reach a verdict as quickly as possible. The result is often decisions that raise serious rule-of-law concerns.”

Furthermore, in 2024, 61 percent of all criminal cases across Germany that resulted in a fine or prison sentence were resolved through a Strafbefehl, without an oral court hearing.

Justice Collective’s Anthony Obst calls for the decriminalization of poverty-related offenses: ”A large part of the punishment system’s work is spent prosecuting people for riding public transportation without a ticket or low-value shoplifting. If efficiency were really the goal, the solution would be to repeal these criminal offenses and seriously address poverty.”

Link to statement

Cases from our archive

Case 39

A young woman experiencing homelessness is sentenced to 90 days of fine payment for supplying drugs. The conviction will not appear on her Certificate of Good Conduct (Führungszeugnis), which was important to her, but the court punishes her with a high fine even as it acknowledges she was supplying drugs because of her poverty.

The War on Drugs
Racist Policing
Criminalizing Poverty
Fine
Drug Offense

Case 34

A man faces trial for stealing a small quantity of food and alcohol. In cases involving substance use (including alcohol and other drugs), courts often want to hear that people facing trial have stopped using substances, are working, or otherwise trying to fit into society. While the defendant ticks all these boxes, and the judge seemingly acknowledges punishment will be counterproductive, she sentences him to a high fine anyway, ending by saying, “Those are the consequences of committing a crime. You should have thought of that at the time.”

Criminalizing Poverty
The War on Drugs
Fine
Theft

Case 32

After spending three nights in pretrial detention, a man faces accelerated proceedings on theft charges for stealing goods valued at about €50. He is sentenced to seven months prison as the prosecutor and judge see his repeated theft offenses as evidence not of his life challenges but rather the need for a harsh sentence. Joined by the person’s attorney, all seem to believe the best place for treatment is in prison.

Criminalizing Poverty
The War on Drugs
Prison
Theft

Case 31

A young man who was unhoused and jailed pretrial is sentenced to pay €750 in fines for theft of food, toiletries, and other small items. Although the court acknowledged that he is experiencing problems related to drug use and poverty, the judge finds that the defendant should have simply “said no” to drugs. The sentence came with a warning that any future offense would lead to incarceration.

Criminalizing Poverty
The War on Drugs
Fine
Theft